Latest
Older
Terrorism
|
This page contains news items that we no longer think current or
relevant enough to go on the main news page.
Generally that means they're at least 90 days old. We may purge items
from the archive from time to time.
March 7, 2006
 |
|
Whack the Whacko!
He wants to revise amply documented history about the Holocaust
and calls for the destruction of Israel. He also wants nuclear
capability. But only for peaceful purposes.
Don't. Make. Me. Laugh.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a would-be Hitler and in light of
his ambitions to acquire nuclear capability and destroy
Israel, must be treated as the dangerous criminal that
he is, not as a statesman whose vitriol is merely debatable
opinion.
The world's nations must unite as one behind their greatest
powers and ensure that Iran either complies fully and without
any further delay with inspections and regulations, or
suffers whatever force is required to annihilate any
and all capabilities having to do with nuclear power in Iran.
We cannot permit that a hate monger, who has publically
professed the intention to destroy another state, acquires the
capability to carry out such plans.
We must ensure immediate and unconditional compilance or
strike without further reservation. No second chances. No delays.
No apologies.
|
February 23, 2006
 |
|
Deja Vu
CNN Reports that ``President Bush today defended his administration's
decision to allow a company from an Arab country to operate
six major U.S. ports, saying, "People don't need to worry about
security."''
Uh-hu. *cough*August*couch*2001*cough*memo*cough. Deja vu?
|
 |
|
Deja Vu #2
Terrorists blow up a gorgeous mosque. Muslims react with
violence. What is this, deja vu all over again?! I'm beginning
to suspect that the whole of these people's vocabulary consists
of violence, violence, and just to be creative, an extra dash
of violence!
Reaction to peace: violence!
Reaction to diversity: violence!
Reaction to disagreement: violence!
Reaction to exasperation: violence!
Reaction to mockery: violence!
Reaction to violence: violence!
Reaction to everything else: violence!
I suppose that smashing things up, setting things on fire,
and killing the neighbors is one way to relieve stress. Or maybe
we're just dealing with a bunch of PCP-crazed baboons. Either
one makes as much sense to me as the other.
Seriously, are they just naturally-born psychopaths?!
|
February 22, 2006
 |
|
Astounding, just astounding!
Someone draws a cartoon, asserting a connection between Islam
and violence, and how do Muslims protest? With violence! (/me
slaps forehead) Can they affirm the cartoon any better? Can
they look any more stupid? If it weren't such a tragedy I'd
be rolling on the floor, laughing. Idjets! Idjets!!
This
sums it right up...
|
January 26, 2006
 |
|
Terrorists in Power
It would have been wrong not to allow Hamas to participate
in the democratic election process. Democracy isn't about exclusion
but about empowerment and letting the voice of the people be
heard, even (or perhaps especially) if those voices speak of
things we would rather not hear. What the Palestinian people
have said with this election is that they are unhappy with the
way Fatah has been handling things and that they feel that the
terror actions of Hamas are more representative of the change
that is needed.
Well, the cat's out of the bag now, isn't it?
Asking Hamas to renounce violence is likely to be as effective
as asking Hitler to renounce the Final Solution. If it
happens at all, it will have no effect on their outlook or their
actions. Hamas' raison d'être is the destruction
of Israel. They aren't going to renounce it anymore than the
U.S. would renounce capitalism or democracy.
Hitler sought the destruction of the Jews and others; Hamas
seeks the destruction of Israel. Now that the Palestinian people
have chosen Hamas to lead them, there is no doubt that a significant
portion of the Palestinian people share the goals of Hamas.
That makes them a terrorist state. It's really as simple as
that.
There is one positive aspect to the outcome of this election:
It spells an end to the "forked tongue" politics that have bedeviled
the peace process for so long. There can be no more pretense
now that the terrorists actually are in charge. The peace process
is likely dead now. And for better or for worse, it may be that
this is the beginning of the end … for the Palestinian
state.
|
December 16, 2005
 |
|
And so it begins...
This is quite possibly the most
significant
violation of federal surveillance laws in over three decades
(since Watergate).
|
 |
|
Whoa!
I'm
not sure what worries me more, the fact that the "President"
authorized it or that 31% of about 81,000 people chose to vote
"Yes" to the question "Should the government have been given
the authority to spy on Americans
without warrants after the 9/11 attacks?"
It does not much surprise me that a president signs such
acts when he has already professed a preference for dictatorial
powers because he'd get things done more swiftly and easily;
but what I am rather dismayed over is the fact that a significant
number of people seem to think it acceptable for the government
to spy on them without judicial oversight or constraints. Have
they never heard of the Sovjet Union and the KGB, or understand
so little of the ways of power that they cannot conceive of
the harm that such powers can bring?
Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
|
December 15, 2005
 |
|
Devastating Diebolt Voting
Machine Hack Proven
A vote that should have been Yes:2 No:6 was hacked
in a demonstration to come out Yes:7 No:1 with only
moderate level access to the voting machine (in an election,
thousands would have such access), no password, and equipment
that can be bought for a couple of hundred dollars off the internet.
The hacked vote was not detected on the voting machine and not
on upload to the tabulation system, either!
Without a verifiable paper trail (which Diebolt voting machines
do not provide) such a hack would go undetected in a real election.
It's just like Josef Stalin said: "Those who cast the votes
decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything."
Read all about the
Diebolt
Voting Machines Hack at BlackBoxVoting.org
|
December 14, 2005
 |
|
Myths
In the continuing story of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's
abbrasive, offensive, and revisionist claims, his latest excretion
has us believe that the Holocaust was a myth. I'm sure it's
just as much a myth as the holy war called-for by Pope Urban
II. that resulted in the Crusades.
Well, at least the man's good for some entertainment value:
We should put him on Saturday Night Live and get a good belly-laugh
out of the crap he spews… I'm sure it'll become a classic.
|
December 1, 2005
 |
|
Iraq: The Forever War
It is becoming increasingly obvious that "President" Bush
has either no intention of ever pulling out of Iraq, or he is
incapable of formulating even a feeble strategy---which is to
say he is incable of formulating any strategy at all---to
effect a timely withdrawal of troops from Iraq.
To have no better strategy than "to win the war" is about
as effective as saying that we won't withdraw until poverty
is no more, or alcoholism is eliminated, or disease, hate, and
injustice wiped from the face of the Earth: It isn't going to
happen and attempting to sell it anyway amounts to a veiled
admission that winning the war isn't what this is about at all.
It's about staying in Iraq.
Occupation must have been the intention from the start (or
the opportunity availed itself soon enough). Now we have a justifiable
military presence in the area, able to serve as a launching
pad for other strategic operations if necessary, or at least
to keep other powers in check.
All we need now is another big terrorist attack to give us
the incentive to bring out the really, really big guns!
Hey, it worked in Japan some sixty years ago; it will work again.
Who is going to stop us from defending ourselves against terrorists?
We'll be at this game forever. Forever War.
|
November 28, 2005
 |
|
OpenDocument vs. Microsoft
XML
Countless companies, cities, jurisdictions, states, and nations
have awoken to the fact that locking up their data in proprietary
formats, such as Microsoft's .doc, has chained them
to the unending upgrade cycle to keep that data accessible,
and is simultaneously channelling public funds into private
corporate hands.
While some have shifted, or at least begun to shift, their
operations from proprietary operating systems and software,
such as Microsoft Windows and Office, to Free (unfettered) systems,
such as GNU/Linux and OpenOffice.org, Microsoft has sought to
hinder and redirect these efforts by seeming to address at least
some of the concerns that prompted the moves towards open and
accessible data formats in the first place: Microsoft has vowed
to open up their XML format.
On the surface---and especially to non-technical personnel---this
would certainly sound great, but Groklaw carries a
Format
comparison between ODF and MS XML to demonstrate that even
if Microsoft's XML format (MSXML) is legally open, it is really
designed to remain as inaccessible as possible, especially when
compared to the well-designed
OASIS
Open Document (ODT) format.
Because MSXML shuns all standards but its own, it pushes aside
the work of countless experts, denies the worth of existing
standards, reduces the value of standard tools, and once again
chains users to what amounts to a standard owned by one company,
a company whose entire business model is founded on proprietary
formats, paranoid control of its market, and an ingenious upgrade
strategy to milk its customers for all that they're worth.
If you lock up your data in a proprietary format, that's
your problem. But if you lock up other people's data---that
of the government's citizens---in proprietary formats and pay
money for it, too, then that amounts to negligence, in my opinion,
if not also misuse of funds!
|
September 11, 2005
 |
|
Osama Bin Laden: Still At
Large
Today, on the 4th anniversary of the "9/11" attacks that
killed over 3000 people, damaged the Pentagon in Washington
D.C., and brought down both towers of the World Trade Center
in New York City, Osama Bin Laden, the perpetrator of these
attacks, remains at large!
Instead of hunting down Osama Bin Laden, "President" Bush
chose to attack Iraq, a wholly unrelated issue to "9/11", which
has already cost the lives of another 1900+ American soldiers
(not to mention many from other nations).
And because of Mr. Bush's misguided and illegal war in Iraq
it is now obvious that the domestic response to Hurricane Katrina
has turned a distaster into a national catastrophe because much
of the military gear is in Iraq, not where it ought to be: protecting
Americans. Hence, even more dead to be ascribed to the stubborn
incompetence of "President" Bush.
Four years after "9/11" I, for one, would like to know this:
Why the f--- is Osama Bin Laden still at large, Mr. "President"
and why are we fighting in Iraq and letting Americans die there
and here at home, instead of going after the terrorists???
|
September 5, 2005
 |
|
The Terrorist in the White
House
So here we have a White House and an administration that
is focused on deceiving American citizens (Iraq had nothing
to do with 9/11) to start and shore up support for an unnecessary
war that has cost the lives of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens
and thousands of American soldiers. And now that disaster strikes
at home (New Orleans) there is are a bunch of assurances and
self-congratulatory rhetoric that does not match the situation
on the ground. Again!
Am I surprised? It appears that the Bush Administration is
not in any way interested in reality but pursuing fantasies
and misguided personal agendas that bring death and destruction
around the world as well as at home, while feeding lies to the
American public in hopes of placating them long enough to get
away with it all.
For all practical purposes the Bush Administration has abandoned
Americans to their own devices, while sending them to die in
a war that did not need fighting. The lies and the contempt
from the Bush Administration for all things that America once
stood for can only mean one thing: "President" Bush is a menace
to this country and to the world. The sooner he is gone, the
better we'll all be for it.
|
September 4, 2005
 |
|
Blind, Deaf, and Dumb
The evacutation of New Orleans should have been initiated
by Tuesday, the day following Hurricane Katrina's nearly direct
hit on the city, and completed in no more than two days. Instead,
it was a slow, inept, and botched operation that took three
or four days to begin, didn't ramp up to full scale until five
days had passed, and wasn't (mostly) completed until six days
after the hurricane struck New Orleans.
It is indefensible that the secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, claims that "the collapse
of a significant portion of the levee leading to the very fast
flooding of the city was not envisioned" when experts had predicted
exactly that scenario for as much as a decade. This attitude
amply demonstrates the fact that the government is asleep at
the wheel, just as it was in the weeks and months leading up
to 9/11, and likely will be so again when the next disaster
strikes.
On Tuesday or latest by Wednesday, when it became clear through
media and other reports that the response to the disaster was
essentially non-existent, "President" Bush should have signed
an executive order to mobilize every available resource from
every accessible state to rush to the aid of those who needed
to be pulled out, who needed food and especially drinking water
to be dropped to help them survive.
But the "President" spent two extra days on vacation; Congress
debated financial aid packages; and private help in the form
of boaters and supply trucks were turned away from the area,
by all appearances these all intended to create a humanitarian
crisis rather than prevent one. And that's the fault of the
Bush administration, no less, whose total lack of true leadership
reflects on the priorities of all branches of government. Bush
didn't think the destruction of a major American metropolis
was important, so why would Congress, why would FEMA, why would
anybody move fast if our leader stays calm and disinterested?
|
August 23, 2005
 |
|
Assassination
Considering the despicable falsehoods and violence that
Pat
Robertson keeps spewing, it would be far more beneficial
for the United States to assassinate Pat Robertson than Venezuela's
President Hugo Chavez.
How can the man call himself a Christian; how can anyone
with a good heart--Christian or otherwise--feel but revulsion
at the likes of him?!
Has he conveniently forgotten that it was Pope Urban II.
who invented the Holy War (Jihad) and launched the Crusades?
Has he forgotten that it was Christian missionaries that brought
to the natives of many nations the choice of Christianity or
death? Does he really think his vitriol is somehow better than
the worst of communism or islamic extremism?
Violence begets violence, Mr. Robertson, and you are the
kind of cancer that ought to be cut out and crushed. At least
have the decency of effecting your departure by your own hand!
The sooner the world is rid of people like Pat Robertson
the sooner we all have an actual chance for peace!
|
February 22, 2005
 |
|
Europa ad Astra
After the Bush administration demonstrated only the most
feeble interest in democracy itself, telling the United Nations
that their voice doesn't matter and that America will wage war
on sovereign nations, such as Iraq, no matter the strength or
acceptability of causal evidence, the Bush administration is
now facing a European Union that is no more inspired by "President"
Bush's attempt to mend fences today, than the millions were
who took to the streets two years ago to speak out against America's
impending aggression.
The Bush administration's continued assertion that its policies
and actions have been and continue to be impeccable betrays
an arrogance that amounts to nothing less than a rude gesture
to the entire rest of the world. Bush's trip to Europe is a
thinly veiled attempt to get Europe to help pay for Bush's stubborn
incompetence. America wants its policies validated; America
needs someone else to help clean up the messy bits; America
seeks a partner in crime.
Make no mistake: If Europe chooses to descend that slippery
slope then Europe will end up paying for the clean-up of Iran
next, and every war that the Bush administration feels somehow
justified to start. And complicity in war brings an allotment
of the blame. Europe has nothing to gain from this, and everything
to lose. Unity against imperialist aggression is Europe's greatest
chance to date to prove whether the Union transcends mere economic
motives, or will lead Europe to take up the mantle of greatness
that America chose to shed decades ago.
|
December 10, 2004
 |
|
Laptop Overheating?
A little tip for those with laptops that are a bit older,
and may have some trouble with the slab overheating and then
shutting down unexpectedly or with a dire warning before all
goes dark: clean out the fan & radiator assembly as
soon as you can! Heck, do it every six months the way you'd
change the oil on your car, and your laptop will live much longer.
Here's my story, for what it's worth:
I've a Sager slab, Northwood Pentium 4 running at 3.067 GHz
and for the past six months this beautiful beast has been having
serious overheating problems. Just running the CPU at full capacity
for ten or twenty minutes could have the thing go through an
emergency shutdown. Nasty!!
The culprit, as I suspected, was dust: Both fans were working
just fine, but I did notice that they were going a million miles
an hour almost all the time, working very hard trying to keep
the slab cool. Just how much dust was in there and just how
much of an impact that made, I found out only after I finally
opened the thing up:
Careful of the heat. The fan & radiator assembly is
hot and can easily give you a serious burn
if you're not careful. I disconnected the two-fan affair, took
a deep breath, and blew hard into the exhaust end of things.
Cloud of dust, floating dust bunnies, and here I sit, still
coughing from it. I gave my lungs a good workout, reassembled
the thing, and now the slab runs at least 10°C to 15°C
cooler than it has been! I've not been able to push it past
63°C even at high CPU usage, where before it would quickly
leap to 75°C and work its way up from there. (80°C is
the max before it forces itself off).
And that's not just good for me and my work, but great news
for the longevity of the CPU.
Just passing on something useful for a change ;-)
|
November 23, 2004
 |
|
No Software Patents!
Under the influence of the patent system and big industry
lobbyists, the European Union is on the verge of making a huge
mistake: to pass a law that would legalize software patents.
Why
is this important?
|
November 5, 2004
 |
|
Divided States of America
Four years ago, Gore won the election, but amidst the struggle
to get every vote counted and then due to the supreme court's
intervention, he was essentially forced to concede the presidency
to Bush.
Through stubborn incompetence Bush has since driven this
country into a multi-faceted morass of economic and political
problems. The world has been hesitant to acknowledge Bush's
legitimacy and in parts vehement in denying it. Bush has never
managed to convince anyone but simpletons and dimwits that Iraq
had any involvement with Al Qaeda, for example, or had anything
more than a desire to acquire new weapons of mass destruction.
Dimwits bought these lies, but nobody else. Dimwits also bought
the lie that the money he borrowed from other nations were actual
tax cuts. The list goes on …
But now, with apparently 51% of Americans legitimizing the
rule of the most destructive and dangerous leader that this
country has ever had, we have told the world that we merely
pay lip-service to democratic ideals: democracy does not apply
to our interaction with other nations; we do not care about
unity: 49% of the nation doesn't matter, and 90% of the world
has no influence on our leaders; and instead of reason we are
proud of primitive dualistic thought: no nuance, no pause, no
exploration, no reflection! That is the image of America projected
around the world!
As
a divider this "president" has proven, and today again confirmed,
his intentions to push a divisive agenda and bully the world
in pursuit of untenable policies abroad. But hey, if you can't
hold onto the world's admiration and respect, we may as well
go all-out and earn their disapproval and disdain!
Hail to the Thief!
|
 |
|
The Victory of American Morality:
A-Morality
The exit polls from the American election campaign have demonstrated
that America voted for Bush based largely on moral grounds.
These include:
- Fabricating evidence and lying,
- Invading sovereign nations on pretenses,
- Murdering tens of thousands of innocents,
- Borrowing beyond reasonable means,
- Enriching the rich and bribing the poor,
- Doing business with the enemy,
- Mortgaging our future.
I'm damn glad that I'm not part of that "moral" majority.
By all truly moral standards their morality is but a sham, a
cover for evil.
"There's a truism that the road to Hell is often
paved with good intentions. The corollary is that
evil is best known not by its motives but by its
methods."
|
November 28, 2004
 |
|
From the Horse's Mouth
"President" Bush declared that someone "who jumps to conclusions
without knowing the facts is not a person you want as commander
in chief."
Guess what? I agree! "President" Bush jumped to conclusions
without knowing the facts about Weapons of Mass Destructions
in Iraq. "President" Bush jumped to conclusions without knowing
the facts about Iraq's ties to Al Qaeda. And he was wrong about
them all.
By "President" Bush's own statements he is unfit to be commander
in chief. Let's make sure he will not be elected this time,
either!
|
 |
|
Yet Another Colossal Failure
ABC
News reports that as many as 100,000 Iraqis have died in
the past 18 months as a direct cause of the ill advised, falsely
reasoned, and unnecessary invasion of Iraq.
Compare that to the number of deaths suffered on 9/11. Consider
that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or the terrorists.
It seems that Osama Bin Laden has found his greatest ally
in "President" Bush: how else could a terrorist leader be kicking
back and through no further effort of his own cause the additional
deaths of 1100 more Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis?
Nice work, Mr. "President"!
And further, what the f--- happened to all those high grade
explosives at Qadaa? Enough of it is missing to repeat the destruction
of Pan Am flight 111 some 200,000 times over. But you were looking
for WMD, Mr. "President", weren't you? Well, by the ratio of
deaths in Iraq, these munitions are probably about 100 times
more likely to cause Iraqi deaths, rather than American deaths,
so that's okay in your book, Mr. "President", isn't it?
Can't read. Can't talk. Can't think. Can't lead. Can't win.
Can't keep us safe. Can't fix the mess he's made. Can't do anything
right. Tell me again why Bush is on the ballot?!
|
October 13, 2004
 |
|
You like getting shafted?
So, you've finally managed to get your budget under control
and begun paying off your credit cards. You get married to that
nice, straight-talking guy, and he starts charging up your credit
cards, takes out a huge loan in your name, gives you a few dollars
of it and hands the rest of your money to his friends.
Sounds ridiculous?
You bet, but that's just what "President" Bush has done:
After America finally managed to get the budget under control
and began paying down the national debt, we got "married" to
Bush. In order to finance all these tax cuts he promised, he
had to borrow money from other nations, such as China. He gave
the vast number of American people half of that money
and the small group of super-rich, got all of the
other half. And Americans will be stuck with paying the
interest on the loan.
And that's just the beginning.
It seems that a whole bunch of Americans are really into
being abused like this, but any woman who married such a man
would do well to divorce him as fast as possible. And Americans
who don't enjoy getting the shaft would do well to consider
how "divorce" would apply in the case of the upcoming elections
…
|
 |
|
For the Record
- War on Terror: Great start, No Follow-through, Then:
Lies
- 9/11 happened on Bush's watch,
- Fewer troops are sent to Afghanistan than NYC has police,
- Bush lets Bin Laden go (by leaving it to former Bin Laden
supporters to capture the world's most dangerous terrorist),
- The administration fabricates evidence on Iraq terror links,
- The administration fabricates evidence on Weapons of Mass
Destruction (WMD) in Iraq,
- The administration ignores overwhelming evidence, public
opinion, the U.N. weapons inspectors, and the rejection
by the United Nations, and goes to war on fabricated evidence
… An illegal war,
- Well over 1,000 Americans are dead as a result of Bush's
mistakes, the Iraqi insurgency is gaining momentum, and
the administration has no exit strategy.
- Economy: The administration's policies are dooming America
to live with permanent debt
- The administration turned a huge surplus into historic deficits
for two years running,
- The administration wants Americans to believe that deficits
are good for us,
- The administration had to borrow money from other nations,
such as China, to pay for the tax cuts (that's not returning
our money to us, that's bribing us and then sticking us
with the interest AND the need to pay it back),
- Bush's tax cuts are dramatically geared towards the very
wealthy, leaving only a pitance to the rest: If America
is 10 people and the tax cut was $10, then nine people got
to split $5, and the other one gets $5 all to himself. Fair?
You be the judge!
- The World: Loss of respect, loss of competitiveness
- The administration's foreign policies have significantly
eroded America's image around the world as a free and democratic
nation,
- The administration's foreign policies have squandered the
unprecedented good-will towards America after the 9/11 attacks,
- The administration's policies reward companies for sending
jobs overseas and laying people off; we are training foreign
workers to do our jobs until we are no longer competitive
in the world market,
- "President" Bush is the first president in over 70 years
who has overseen an overall reduction in jobs; even the
jobs tha are created, pay much less than those that were
lost,
- Millions of Americans have slipped under the poverty line
on this "President's" watch; millions of Americans live
now without health care; millions of Americans now have
the choice of being poor or being broke; of being sick or
being ill,
The choices: tough words without substance (more of the same
lies and deception that got us here in the first place), or
a fresh start with a president who can change the dire course
that the Bush administration has set us on.
|
October 11, 2004
 |
|
The #1 Threat to America
and the World
The #1 threat to America and the World is the Bush administration:
The United Nations rejected the evidence that the Bush administration
fabricated about Iraq (weapons of mass destructions and ties
to Al Qaeda) but the Bush administration sent the nation to
war anyway. The evidence has proven the UN right and the Bush
administration wrong, with disastrous results so far. And things
aren't getting any better.
The Bush administration has made a travesty of the rule of
law, brought chaos to Iraq, and has no clue how to stabilize
Iraq and bring American troops home. Well over 1000 Americans
have died in Iraq since "Mission Accomplished". The rate of
their deaths has been accellerating significantly. $120 billion
have already been spent, and $200 billion are fully committed.
There is no grand coalition to help us, and Europe and other
nations are poised to turn their back on America if Bush is
elected to lead America for another four years.
The stubborn incompetence of this administration is pushing
America closer and closer to the brink. "Four More Years" is
not just a sentence, it is cruel and unusual punishment to a
nation that deserves much, MUCH better leadership than Bush
is capable of!
Take heed, America!
|
October 8, 2004
 |
|
Fear Mongering
"President" Bush's simple tactic for re-election is fear
mongering: scare Americans not to change horse in midstream.
So far it seems that Americans are easily scared …
|
October 3, 2004
 |
|
Mistakes, Lies, and More
of the Same
Outsourcing national security?! If Bush must counter Kerry's
plans with preposterously feeble-minded bullshit like that,
then it's clear that he's got nothing new to offer
to fix the mess he's made. His only chance now is to fling mud
that makes his own supporters look like morons if they buy it.
Ouch. Going, going, ' elipsis '
|
October 1, 2004
 |
|
Stubbornly Incompetent 'W'
Flails Ineffectively
Unwilling to admit his mistakes, unable to correct them,
and stubbornly insistent to keep the present course against
all evidence that his foreign policies are worse than failures,
"President" Bush keeps insisting on
more
of the same.
Wake up America and show that man the door!
|
September 22, 2004
 |
|
Said the Nazgul: "Nevermore"
Groklaw published "The Nazgul", a derivative work of the
intellectual property of Edgar Allan Poe, by Alanyst; this is
so well done that I just had to link to it. Enjoy
The Nazgul |
 |
|
Stubborn Incompetence
The linguistic sharp-shooter who put these two words together
deserves the highest medal. Nothing sums up Bush better than
these two words. I am in awe! |
September 19, 2004
 |
|
I'm so happy I can hardly
count...
"President" Bush is pleased with the progress in Iraq.
- More than 1000 Americans have died in Iraq, more than 1/3
of those who died on 9/11,
- The number of American deaths in Iraq is on the increase,
- Control is slipping increasingly into the hands of insurgents,
And "President" Bush is pleased with this progress?!
The terrorists are probably pleased, too!
So what side is the man on? What drugs is he taking? How
long does he think we believe his deluded interpretations that
things are going well? How long are we going to hold still,
or even turn away from the truth that Iraq is the worst mess
that America has stumbled into since the Vietnam War?
Are we all going to follow him over the cliff, chanting Dubya,
dubya, dubya as we go?
And just what ever happend to hunting down that guy who attacked
us on 9/11? What was his name again? Osama bin Laden, that's
right! What ever became of him? Weren't we supposed to be going
after terrorists or something?!
Mr. "President", do you know what time it is? It's time for
America to wake up and smell the coffee: Your supposedly strong
leadership in the days after 9/11 was a no-brainer. Where you
have led America since then is the WRONG direction, down the
WRONG road, around the WRONG corner, and into the WRONG war.
And in case you didn't notice, Dubya: WRONG is spelled with
a 'W'!
|
July 30, 2004
 |
|
W-W-Wrong turn!
Without vision or understanding, George W. Bush misled the
country, looted its people, and bribed Americans to the tune
of 82 cents a day while simultaneously sticking them with the
interest payments. What's that about the kingdom of the blind...?
And now he claims that we have ``turned a corner, and [won't]
look back.'' -- Too bad it's the wrong damned corner,
ya W---er! |
February 3, 2004
 |
|
Death: 1, Life: 0
I really wonder about a society where a woman's exposed breast,
regardless the circumstance, intent, or purpose, gathers more
outrage and furor than the destruction of human life in war.
I'm a stranger in a strange land.
|
December 14, 2003
 |
|
Saddam Hussein Captured!
Wouldn't
you know it? They caught the rat, hiding in a filthy rat hole.
And that after he swore he'd never be taken alive. Let's just
hope that's the real Saddam and not one of his many doubles.
;-)
A lot of uncertainty has been put to rest, I'm sure, about
the possibility that Saddam Hussein might be working on a return
to power. Maybe this will now help steer Iraq away from its
recent past and towards a brighter future.
Congratuatulations to all who had a hand in the capture of
the former Iraqi dictator!
(Now where is Osama Bin Laden hiding? After
all, he's the one we should really be going after…)
|
December 5, 2003
 |
|
SCO: Summarily Clueless Organization
It's not April Fool's day, so I must assume that SCO's
open
letter on copyright is intended to be serious. What it reveals
is SCO's (or at least Darl McBride's) utter failure to comprehend
the concept that U.S. copyright does not require restrictions
on copying. Ever hear of Public Domain? Ever hear of Shareware?
Further, he fails to understand that the Free Software Foundation
hasn't "actively and intentionally undermine[d] the U.S. and
European systems of copyrights and patents" but is, in fact,
using those systems to ensure that the requirements of the GPL
are enforceable.
The cluelessness revealed in that letter speaks perhaps more
clearly than anything of just how misguided SCO is, and how
thoroughly they will be trounced. It's almost sad to see people
making fools of themselves in public and not even realize it
even after being slapped silly for months on end. But I guess
that's what defines a fool.
|
November 26, 2003
 |
|
Endangered Species: The Real
America
Violations of civil liberties, curtailed freedoms, increased
powers of various law-enforcement agencies, increased secrecy
in the name of national security… Where is it leading
us? and why?
Timothy McVeigh, blew up a government building in Oklahoma
City. We caught him. We punished him. As a nation we learned
to live with the loss and the pain and we moved on.
Osama Bin Laden's henchmen took down both World Trace Center
towers in New York City and destroyed parts of the Pentagon.
And while these actions were more outrageous and more destructive
than the Oklahoma City bombing, the attacks have also inspired
us with fear the likes of which we saw only in the McCarthy
era.
It is not surprising that fear gives birth to a desire for
security, but as Benjamin Franklin said in his Historical Review
of Pennsylvania in 1759: "They that can give up essential
liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither
liberty nor safety." Let us not be hasty, therefore, in
our search for security!
Our losses on September 11 were expressions of our nation's
greatness, not the greatness itself. America isn't defined by
buildings and dams and railroads and other infrastructure, however
tall and glorious we build them; no, America is defined by the
philosophies of freedom, trust, and openness.
We define enemy nations by the way they restrict freedoms,
distrust their own citizens, and maintain paranoid controls
over as much as they can. It seems that we're on the way to
join their ranks: Piece by piece we're throwing our principles
away, sacrificing our essence on the altar of security. If this
worked then dictatorships would be secure (if unhappy) societies.
But it doesn't work, and it is in our fear-inspired devaluation
of our own principles (one little bit at a time) that the terrorists
are achieving their most devastating victory yet.
If Osama Bin Laden wants to destroy us then perhaps he has
found in some of our own leaders his greatest allies: In the
two years following the September 11 attacks we've fought two
wars to little positive effect, lost sympathy and credibility
abroad, and become no more secure for any of it than we were
before. And yet we are told not merely to press on, but to increase
the pace by which we curtail our own principles and undermine
our values. Our freedoms are leaking away by our own hands,
and with them, our essence.
If the mayhem of destruction wasn't his goal, and he is indeed
seeking the destruction of America, then Osama Bin Laden is
probably hunched in some cave somewhere amazed at how swiftly
we are working to complete the destruction that he set in motion
on September 11.
Is there no better way? Perhaps we can find an answer
to this by examining the path we have been treading for decades
past, a path that has fostered especially recently a fast-increasing
hostility against us in the world around. What have we done
right in the past, and in what ways have we gone wrong? If we
wish to survive as the greatest nation, as a free society, and
a role model to the world, then we must be willing to admit
where mistakes were made and correct our course before it is
too late.
We cannot "cure" the hatred that is driving our present enemies
and it appears that we are equally unable to capture their leaders,
be they official heads of government or renegade cave dwellers.
But it is with future generations that we can have influence
if we take the philosophical wind out of the sails that have
given rise to and are driving our present foes.
Millions of people around the world are disenchanted with
us even though we had the world's sympathy after September 11.
We must face the fact that it is our own actions that have caused
such a dramatic shift in attitudes towards us. Has fear transformed
us so much that we are willing to live on as a caricature of
our former greatness? Or do we have the strength to admit failure
where it exists and by demonstrating true greatness (not power,
but greatness), reduce the chance that we are viewed with anger,
hatred, or contempt?
We have within us the strength to overcome any problem, so
long as our solutions aren't driven by fear and unreason. "The
only thing we have to fear is fear itself" said President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt during his inaugural address in 1933.
We need to examine the root causes of terrorism against the
backdrop of our own values, eliminate as much as reasonably
possible the causes of such extremist hatred, and thereby save
our nation, our principles, and our right to lead the world
by good example.
It's not a simple problem and there are no easy answers,
but we have far too much to lose to take the easy route and
pretend that our own actions have had no influence on the diminishing
favor of millions around the world, and that similar over years
hasn't somehow contributed to inspiring our enemies to attack
us.
If we stay the present course we'll squander our liberties
one chunk or sliver at a time, and fall from grace to mediocrity.
And that's when the terrorists will have won.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance"
|
October 29, 2003
 |
|
It's not about the icon…
Every once in a while I come across a thing of beauty, something
that reverberates harmoniously, and I wish everyone would grok...
How
To Become A Hacker
Thanks, Eric!
|
August 21, 2003
 |
|
Rockin' on without Microsoft
News.com has an interesting, down-to-earth article about
Ernie Ball, the world's leading maker of premium guitar strings,
who got screwed by Microsoft, ditched them for GNU/Linux, and
is now doing better for it, too.
It's
a fun read although his statement that there is no such
thing as free software needs to be understood from the
capitalist perspective
only, rather than the philosophical one.
|
August 18, 2003
 |
|
God Offers to Resign Over
Heat Deaths
Citing His inattention to the devastating heat wave the caused
the deaths of thousands of His subjects all across Europe recently,
God offered to resign his post today as Supreme Being.
"Yes, I am all-powerful and all-knowing," He admitted, "but
obviously not ever-watchful." After a brief pause, He added:
"Clearly I was out to lunch on that one and I am prepared to
take full responsibility."
When asked about the massive power failure in the United
States, the continuing crisis in the Middle East, health crisis
in Africa, and a variety of other ailments that afflict His
subjects in ever greater numbers, God merely shook His head
and offered that He had no further comment.
|
 |
|
FSF: SCO Scuttles Sense,
Claiming GPL Invalidity
"…what SCO's lawyer actually said was arrant, unprofessional
nonsense… SCO has no defense whatever against
the GPL…"
Read
Eben Moglen's complete statement for the Free Software Foundation.
In short, SCO's lawyers are on thin ice, if any ice at all.
More like Wile E. Coyote, not yet realizing that he's already
gone over the cliff. Now I know what lawyers not to hire! |
August 10, 2003
 |
|
The TCO Lie
Ceaseless are the debates over Total Cost of Ownership
(TCO): Is Microsoft Windows cheaper to operate in the long run,
or are free (free, as in freedom) systems based on BSD or GNU/Linux
less expensive to operate?
That this debate has not been ended decisively demonstrates
a profound blindspot within the debate, a blindspot that should
be easy to recognize now, in light of the latest virus of
the week that--surprise, surprise--affected only Microsoft
Windows. Yet again.
The W32.Blaster worm disabled the Maryland Motor Vehicle
Administration (MVA) by noon, leaving hundreds, perhaps thousands
of customers unable to accomplish for what they may have taken
off a day from work, and spent already hours in line. Countless
offices across the nation (or world!) spent hours hunting down
solutions, or working around suddenly incapacitated computers,
networks, and basic operating system facilities such as a dysfunctional
cut-and-paste capability.
Alas, the frequency with which Microsoft Windows operating
systems are afflicted with such problems has become endemic,
and people have become as used to them as the squeaking of the
floor in the hallway, the creak of the bathroom door, or whatever
aches and pains their life may experience on a regular basis.
Computing in general has, in the public eye, become an excercise
in regular frustration so much, that its price is simply forgotten
when it comes to figuring TCO.
Each time that NT 4 or Windows 2000, or Windows XP blows
up on me (and they do so with hair-raising frequency, at least
once or twice a week, sometimes several times a day, even XP)
my work is interrupted and I spend a while restoring data, and
trying to get back to where I was before being so unnecessarily
interrupted in my work.
Add this up over the course of a year and I probably spend
several complete work days, perhaps an entire work week, in
recovery mode, full of frustration and wishing I could reformat
yet another Windows box and put GNU/Linux on it so I can get
my work done once and for all without slow-downs, long waits,
lost data, crashes, and the repeated frustration of recovery.
To me, the debate over TCO is more than clear: Microsoft
Windows only wins over the likes of … of … hmmm,
is there any operating system that blows up in so many way,
so often, is prone to so many security problems, and causes
so much lost data? Somehow I can't think of any, but if you
find out, why don't you tell the
Department of Homeland Security
about it? I'm sure they would like to switch from Windows to
an even less stable and more insecure system!
|
August 8, 2003
 |
|
The SCO Mafia Family
There has been a time in American history, as perhaps in
the history of other nations, when threats without legal basis
have forced victims to pay up or pay the price set by the extortionists.
That era in America was most notoriously characterized by a
man named Al Capone.
The parallels to SCO's recent (and continuing) demands are
striking: SCO alleges that Unix source code (to which they own
the rights) made its way illegally into the Linux kernel and
as a result they are now demanding that everyone must pay them
a license fee of $700 per copy of GNU/Linux (soon to go up to
$1500 or something outrageous like that).
Never mind the fact that they themselves shipped GNU/Linux
under the
GNU
General Public License (GPL) which expressly forbids imposing
any other license terms (such as the requirement for fees) while
at the same time ensuring that the source code is free (as in
un-proprietary and unhindered).
And all this without having even proven the alleged violation
in a court of law!! What does that amount to? Serious, damaging
threats based on unsubstantiated claims of violations that may
or may not have occurred, and are most certainly null and void
now that they licensed everything under the GPL.
And yet they persist.
If only the Department of Justice hadn't shown itself to
be so impotent recently, then Chris Sontag and the rest of the
Gang from SCO might find themselves wearing fashionable orange
jump suits soon and acting out the part of somebody's bitch
in prison…
If nothing else, we can hope that IBM drains the fuckers
dry and leaves their virtual corpses for the rats to gnaw on.
I sure know what I'd do if I ran into Mr. Sontag.
Have you viewed the source today?
|
July 11, 2003
 |
|
Food for Thought…
For some reason this quote strikes me as interesting, what
with all these exaggerations and lies coming to the light after
they've served their purpose:
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the
populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led
to safety) by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.
-- H.L. Mencken
|
June 27, 2003
 |
|
FindLaw: Why IBM Should Win…
Legal commentary on the likelihood that
IBM
should win the case that SCO brought against it.
Personally, I'd like to see Sam Palmisano and Linux Torvalds
dressed in giant penguin outfits jump on Chris Sontag and Bill
Gates and stomp them into the ground… But maybe that's
just me ;-)
|
June 23, 2003
 |
|
"SCO is full of it" -- Linus
Torvalds
Not one to beat around the bush, Linus has some opinions
on the whole SCO debacle:
Read
the eWeek interview
|
 |
|
Big Surprise: SCO unable
to push-over IBM
"If The SCO Group hopes to change the course of IBM's AIX
operating system and its use by enterprise customers, the Lindon,
Utah-based company appears set to fail…"
Read
the InfoWorld article
|
June 17, 2003
 |
|
Delenda est SCO
If I worked at SCO, I would not be working at SCO anymore.
<shudder> I'd be quitting this very second just to save
my career, not to mention my karma:
SCO is now screeching to the tune of $3 billion in damages
and laying claim to AIX, IRIX, GNU/Linux, and possibly BSD and
even Microsoft Windows: "We believe that UNIX System V
provided the basic building blocks for all subsequent computer
operating systems, and that they all tend to be derived from
UNIX System V (and therefore are claimed as SCO's intellectual
property)."
Like the
BYTE
article says: All your base are belong to us.
|
June 10, 2003
June 9, 2003
 |
|
SCO vs. Linux: Chicken &
Egg?
Today's news is that SCO owns the copyrights to Unix and
that it appears that Unix code has found its way into Linux.
Or did Linux code find its way into Unix? After all, Linux has
been around since 1991 and SCO bought rights to Unix from Novell
some five years later, in 1996. Where did the code come
from that Unix and Linux appear to share? Did it come from
yet another project? After all, programmers devise algorithms
and take that knowledge from job to job (not verbatim, but as
a concept).
And considering that SCO continued to sell their own Linux
distribution (with the disputed code) for about two months after
sueing IBM, they have supported knowingly and effectively the
GPL for that code and everything that goes with it. IANAL but
it would seem to me that they gave up their copyright by distributing
(and thus licensing) the code under the GPL.
So now SCO wants to yank IBM's license for AIX unless IBM
pays up and walks away with the tail between its corporate legs.
I'd be surprised if IBM caves under that sort of pressure, but
you never know: Tomorrow's headlines might read 'David [SCO]
topples Goliath [IBM]'
Naaaah…
|
May 30, 2003
 |
|
OpenOffice.org v1.1
The pervasiveness of Microsoft Office has, for better or
for worse, defined how the vast majority of people work with
documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Alas, the price
of Microsoft Office is not insignificant and the licensing fees
become exorbitant over time. Add to that Microsoft's habit of
altering the data formats of documents with practically every
major release, forcing everyone to upgrade or become incompatible
with the rest of the world, and it all amounts to virtual extortion,
all in the name of so-called "innovation".
It's not a pretty picture, but one that has been a cross
to bear without alternatives in sight. Until now!
Enter
OpenOffice.org,
an entirely free
office suite and practically complete clone of Microsoft Office
(and more!). A commercial version of it (StarOffice) is offered
at a moderate price by Sun Microsystems, and includes technical
support that the free version does not.
OpenOffice.org supports so much of what Microsoft Office
has to offer that the few features missing will hardly be noticed
by anyone. In fact, OpenOffice.org looks so much like Microsoft
Office that casual observers may not notice the differences
until they start using the software: the look-and-feel of both
is practically identical!
OpenOffice.org 1.1 is currently in beta. As with most free
(as well as open source) software products, it will be released
when it's ready. But 1.1beta2 has proven stable and highly functional
for us. This is yet another superb addition to the world of
free software.
Versions are available for GNU/Linux, Mac OS X (X11), Solaris,
and Microsoft Windows.
Updated June 11, 2003: Did you know that OpenOffice.org
can export documents as PDF? Did you know that the Impress presentation
tool (basically a PowerPoint-type program) can generate Flash?
You didn't know that, did you? And it's free, too!
|
March 20, 2003
 |
|
No WoMD? No legitimacy!
Well, now that "President" Bush has started the war with
Iraq, we better find those rumored Weapons of Mass Destruction
really fast! If there aren't any then it'd be pretty
clear that this war is more about settling old accounts than
pressing issues…
tick… tick… tick…
<sigh>
|
February 19, 2003
 |
|
American Democracy coughing
up blood?
Anti-war protests millions strong all over Europe (London:
1 million, Italy: 1 million, Spain: 2-3 million) leave U.S.
"President" George W. Bush unswayed. In fact, he is said not
to consider those protests in his plans.
Maybe those millions of protesters aren't Americans, but
for a democratic nation to ignore such numbers among those it
tends to count among its allies, is hypocrisy at best and blatant
imperialism at worst.
Where's the beef, Mr. "President"?
If the U.S. cannot supply proof sufficient to win over the
United Nations that a war against Iraq is necessary then what
is the point of such a war? And what nation is next in the cross-fire
of the American military, directed by a man whose democratic
mandate has been questionable from Day One? What's really
going on here?
A strong conviction that something must be done
is the parent of many bad measures.
-- Daniel Webster
|
January 30, 2003
 |
|
<Yawn!>
Grey skies. Quiet day. Bored…
|
September 10, 2002
 |
|
Blind…
U.S. "President" George W. Bush seems to be banking on the
possibility that Iraq will simply hold still while U.S. forces
clobber its troops in an attempt to topple Saddam Hussein. Already
forgotten is Iraq's previous attempt (in 1991) to strike at
Israel to widen the conflict and bring the Arab world over to
its side. If Saddam Hussein succeeds this time, the consequences
may well exceed what Bush bargained for.
The fact that Bush continues to push ahead with a war effort
borders on unconscionable. No wonder that almost nobody supports
the path to insanity!
|
July 10, 2002
 |
|
National City Mortgage Performs
Unauthorized Withdrawal
The company servicing our house loan, National City Mortgage,
performed an unauthorized withdrawal of over $2000 from our
bank account and now, a month after robbing us of the funds,
insults us when we demand that they speed up their refund.
Is this corporate thievery? |
June 19, 2002
 |
|
Microsoft Ships Outdated
and Incompatible Java … AGAIN
In a move that can only be described as spiteful and obstructing
progress, Microsoft has decided to ship once again a Java Virtual
Machine (JVM) in Windows. Alas, it is a long-abandoned version
of Java based on the Java 1.1 platform, five years out of date.
Delivering an old (nay ancient!) version of Java today is
a bit like installing a version of Microsoft Word 95 in an attempt
to read the documents you take home from the office today: it's
not likely to work. But if you didn't know why, you would soon
get frustrated with the inability to get your work done. Likewise,
when modern Java applications fail, usually requiring at least
the Java 2 platform, users are likely to blame the companies
producing that failing Java application rather than "poor, battered"
Microsoft who is the real culprit.
The VM that Microsoft is shipping was not even Java compliant
in its day, back in 1997 or 1998, when Sun Microsystems sued
Microsoft for shipping an incomplete and non-Java compatible
product with the trademarked name "Java" attached.
Now Microsoft is trying to pull a fast one on us all: ship
the same old thing again, but this time simply avoid calling
it "Java", while at the same time putting it to work where Java
is required.
Well, I've got to hand it to Microsoft: when it comes to
all the evil tricks in the book, that company has even added
a few chapters of of its own!
Ptui!
|
April 25, 2002
 |
|
Mozilla 1.0 Is Coming!
It's been a long, long road for Mozilla, but the lizard isn't
dead yet. Far from it, in fact. Mozilla has quietly grown into
a formidable piece of work, a modular and highly standards-compliant
browser. It represents the long-awaited answer to the savage
mess that Netscape and Microsoft produced when they leaped off
the path of standards compliance and turned their browsers into
conflicting products that served each company as a weapon but
caused unbelievable headaches to web developers over the years.
The amount of interest in Mozilla and its reusable rendering
engine (known as "Gecko") is enormous: AOL (who bought Netscape
some years ago), for example, seems to be looking to use Gecko
in its product, effectively adopting the lizard. Such adoption
bodes well for web developers and the hundreds of millions of
web users, too. Developers can write to one standard, reducing
the size and complexity of pages, and forcing proprietary, wayward
implementations to implement the standard or die.
The internet is built on open standards: tcp/ip, ftp, http,
email, and xml to name a few; these standards allow millions
of diverse computers and operating systems to interoperate.
But when proprietary software corrupts standards in order to
further corporate goals, and in the process brings harm to hundreds
of millions of people, then it is time to insist on standards
compliance and refuse any and all support for the anti-standard.
And this is where Mozilla comes in: a return to standards,
a return to sanity. But more important, perhaps, to those who
don't care who controls their life or profits from it: Mozilla
is an awesome browser. Mozilla rocks!
|
December 23, 2001
 |
|
One. More. Time.
It sure is annoying when the site goes down, the server goes
away, and restoration of service goes awry. We're now with a
professional hosting service where this kind of thing won't
happen again. Hopefully. As in ``keeping our fingers crossed''.
|
December 21, 2001
 |
|
Lord of the Rings: Fellowship
of the Ring
I've been hooked on Tolkien since the very early '80s, have
read the books numerous times, and followed the news about this
film since 1999 with a strange mix of hopeful excitement and
wary dread: so much of J.R.R. Tolkien's creation lives
beneath the surface of the story that even a faithful reproduction
of the storyline itself could not hope to bring the books to life.
But Peter Jackson has accomplished what seemed nigh-impossible:
He managed to translate the heart and soul of the books
onto the screen!
Sure, Tom Bombadil is nowhere to be found, and Lothlórien
is far darker (and even claustrophobic) than I envisioned the
golden wood, and Galadriel seems powerful and dignified, but
also terrifyingly dark; but these are adjustments and interpretations
that do not violate the spirit of Tolkien's work. It is in these
adjustments that Jackson's genius is revealed: He "groks" Tolkien!
I'm going to see this film again. And again. And again. I'm
going to pre-order the DVD as soon as it's announced. I'm going
to go crazy waiting for the next two films. But oh, the wait
has (and will have) been worth it!
|
October 29, 2001
 |
|
WebLord 2.3
A sudden burst of energy has resulted in a couple of feature
additions to Weblord, resulting in the release of version 2.3.
Grab it while it's hot! :-)
Curious about Weblord? Read the preliminary PDF Weblord manual
available in our Publications Section
for a good introduction to the software's concepts. Weblord
also ships with HTML documentation, reference, and tutorial
material that, when printed out, amounts to over a 100 pages
of former trees.
Read more about
WebLord! |
October 19, 2001
 |
|
WebLord 2.2
We are happy to announce that Weblord 2.2 for Linux is now
available for download from our
Linux Products Section. It
has been two years since 2.1 was released. I guess that means
we've been happy enough with the software …
Curious about Weblord? Read the preliminary PDF Weblord manual
available in our Publications Section
for a good introduction to the software's concepts. Weblord
also ships with HTML documentation, reference, and tutorial
material that, when printed out, amounts to over a 100 pages
of former trees.
Read more about
WebLord! |
October 7, 2001
 |
|
U.S. and British Forces Attack
Taliban Installations in Afghanistan
At around 12:35 PM East Coast time, Military action
has begun against military installations in Afghanistan held
by the Taliban to criple the Taliban's---and by extension Osama
bin Laden's---access to the air, air-defense, and radar installations.
The "President" of the United States has indicated that allies
have pledged military support, so there may be a lot more coming
in the near future.
|
October 3, 2001
 |
|
HOW-TO: Automating Linux
PPP
If you are running Linux and you want to automate your PPP
connection, bringing the connection up and down at certain times,
and ensuring that the line is redialed if the connection drops
unexpectedly, then this is the document to show you how!
Read it now! |
September 11, 2001
 |
|
Terrorist Attack on United
States
During the first hours of the attacks most news services
on the web were completely overwhelmed and effectively inaccessible,
so we provided a detailed chronology here, including pictures
of the devastation for those who didn't have a TV or radio available
(how likely is that in this day and age?). At this point, however,
it no longer makes sense to duplicate other services' work,
so we've thrown out the unnecessary details.
I can't even begin to express the horror and the sadness
I feel at the senseless devastation and loss of life. I can
only hope that all those who are responsible for this incredible
tragedy, and those who support them directly or indirectly,
are made to pay the very highest and dearest price for the heinous
deed, and made to pay it swiftly!
There's a truism that the road to Hell is often paved
with good intentions. The corollary is that evil is best known
not by its motives but by its methods.
We've created a special section titled
News, Rants, and Opinions about the
War on Terrorism to help keep this, our general news page,
less cluttered.
Get
other details at the CNN ``America Under Attack'' site |
September 6, 2001
 |
|
Feds Stop Seeking Microsoft
Breakup
The Bush administration has reversed the strategy of the
Clinton White House against software giant Microsoft, deciding
not merely to stop seeking the breakup of the company but also
not seeking to pursue the software bundling issues at the heart
of the multi-year antitrust suit.
Looks like the Borg Collective has been saved yet again!
(Click for larger image)
Read
more about Microsoft's victory |
August 23, 2001
 |
|
The Digital Millennium Copyright
Act (DMCA): The End of Fair Use
The DMCA has been controversial even before it was passed
into law. But now it seems to be revealing itself as one of
the worst laws ever to have been passed, making criminals out
of innocent people and giving police power to corporations.
Read our paper on the DMCA |
August 17, 2001
 |
|
47 Ursae Majoris
Two gas giants are now known to exist around 47 Ursae Majoris,
a star about 45 light years from us. Not only are their orbits
nearly circular, which means that they are not prone to extreme
temperature ranges, but the star's ``habitable zone'' is free
from such gas giants, meaning that there could be smaller, possibly
even Earth-like planets (or at least ones able to support some
form of life) orbiting there!
See
Washington Post article for more details |
August 8, 2001
 |
|
The Internet Worm
I haven't laughed this hard in a while (or maybe
it was just the surprising twist on the word ;-)
See
The Joy of Tech |
July 27, 2001
 |
|
Is this Justice? The U.S.
refuses to drop charges against Sklyarov
Arrested at the apparent request of Adobe Systems for purported
violation of the controversial Digital Millennium Copyright
Act (DMCA) Dmitry Sklyarov, a Russian citizen and Ph.D. student
remains in a United States jail. He is being held without bail.
This from the
Free
Dmitry Sklyarov site: He helped create the Advanced eBook
Processor (AEBPR) software for his Russian employer Elcomsoft.
According to the company's website, the software permits eBook
owners to translate from Adobe's secure eBook format into the
more common Portable Document Format (PDF). The software only
works on legitimately purchased eBooks and has been used by
blind people to read otherwise-inaccessible PDF user's manuals,
and by people who want to move an eBook from one computer to
another (just like anyone can move a music CD from the home
player to a portable or car).
Even though Adobe Systems has reportedly dropped the charges
against Mr. Sklyarov, the United States seems to be refusing
to let him go!
|
 |
|
Is Adobe Systems Evil?
Adobe Systems has been reported to be the catalyst of the
travesty of injustice that is unfolding in the case of Dmitry
Sklyarov. We at Ringlord Technologies hereby call upon Adobe
Systems to prove unequivocally to the world community whether
they are merely blowing hot air or are willing to make good
on their mistake and put their company's legal power at Dmitry's
disposal.
What will it be, Adobe? Are you willing to earn the hatred
of people all over the world for what you started or will you
leave behind the ice-cold corporate savagery of the path you
seem to be treading and push as hard as possible for Mr. Sklyarov's
release?
Could Mr. Sklyarov's situation become the catalyst to
start an ugly struggle between the people and the corporations?
Is a Boycott really what Adobe (and other corporations) are
looking to invoke?
|
July 24, 2001
 |
|
Almost There…
The site is nearly complete again. One piece of advise: the
Amiga pages, including advise on how to get Java running on
the Amiga, have moved back to Udo's personal set of pages, where
they used to live (a long time ago). |
July 23, 2001
 |
|
Restoration Nearing Completion
Most of the site has been restored (and slightly reorganized
in the process). Some links may lead into nowhere land now,
but the new organization should help you find the resources
quickly and without much trouble. If that is not the case, please
email us at the ``support'' address on the
contact page. |
July 20, 2001
 |
|
Banner Ads, Banner Ads…
Recent studies have shown that the new, larger banner ads
are 40% more effective in annoying people and causing them to
either not visit the site again or turn off their browser's
automatic image loading for the site. Chief among these new,
more annoying ads are those that open new windows (``popup ads'')
to slow down the computer, reduce the computer's available resources,
and raise the user's blood-pressure. |
July 19, 2001
 |
|
GPL Rank Has Moved
What happened to GPL Rank?! As some/many of you may
recall we hosted Uwe Schuerkamp's GPL Rank when Uwe had to move
the site. With the downing of our server Uwe has found
a new home for GPL Rank again. You can reach it under its original
name (which has never ceased to work):
gplrank.schuerkamp.de
Like a racecar, GPL Rank seems rarely to be found in one spot
for long… ;-) |
 |
|
Back online
We're back now with a new look (one that we've been looking
to put in place for a while now).
Many of the pages are still incomplete
because we've been trying to work major updates into the text.
If you get bad links be assured that we know about them already… |
July 18, 2001
 |
|
/me slaps his forehead
Although I had forgotten about it for nearly a week, I had
changed the authentication method for my domain's maintenance
with Network Solutions from mail-auth to crypt-pw a few months
ago. This allowed me to actually change the DNS records for
the domain to this new server, hosted by the good graces and
the unwavering friendship of Uwe Schuerkamp. |
July 12, 2001
 |
|
Like a rat out of an aquaduct!
``The economy doesn't look so bad until you get hit in the
face with bad news yourself.'' That's what happened to me: my
employer wiped 15% of the main office (8% of the whole company)
from the payroll and as one of the earliest and one of the more
expensive developers I was part of that elite bunch, along with
many of the original people who helped build the company. No,
it doesn't make any sense to me, either.
Unfortunately the Ringlord Technologies site was hosted by
my employer, too, and the corporate axemen, in typical corporate
axeman fashion, axed any and all access to, as well as the DNS
records for Ringlord Technologies, effectively evaporating our
domain. Geee, thanks guys!
Now I know what they mean when they refer to employees as
``human capital''… Let's just say the term means exactly
what ``respected human being'' does not.
|
April 30, 2001
 |
|
Photogenics Trademark Battle
Paul Nolan needs evidence of receipts of Photogenics 1.x
or 2.0 sold in the U.S. to prove that Photogenics was a commercial
product (marketed/sold) in the U.S. so that he doesn't lose
the rights to the name of his product.
Read
more at Paul Nolan's Site now! |
April 20, 2001
 |
|
Ye Odd Mix of Bits: Record
Industry vs. Anything MP3
Let me say it right up front: I love Napster, OpenNap, and
the whole idea of being able to replace my old vinyl collection
with digital copies, without having to pay for the stuff all
over again. I've worn out much of that old vinyl but I really
feel cheated by the recording industry: After all the duplicates
I've bought (which I now have on vinyl and CD) they
are now basically telling me that I better cough up a bunch
of extra cash and buy a second copy of all that music. Maybe
I should sue them for selling me defective media, stuff that
wears out, and is, in fact designed from the very beginning
to wear out with each playing.. Hmmm!
Granted, there's probably a fair bit of piracy going on,
people downloading stuff that they haven't paid for. I've even
downloaded stuff I've never owned, stuff I was curious about.
Most of the stuff I've just deleted again. What I found to be
good I used to go out and purchase.
But what irks me more than anything now is that any legitimate
purchase I make is essentially supporting the music industry's
litigation machine, providing them with the means of restricting
my freedom. How, in a clear mind, can I justify screwing myself
that way? Buy more music: screw myself. I don't think so!
But it's a bit of a conundrum, obviously: the RIAA refuses
to interpret my refusal to buy music as a protest. It will interpret
it as piracy, thereby justifying its twisted reasoning and litigious
ways.
I don't know what is right. What I do know is that it's wrong
for me to have to purchase things twice or even three times.
It's wrong for the industry to keep me from digitizing the music
I have and storing it on my harddisk. It's wrong for the RIAA
to restrict my freedom. I can only hope that they come to their
senses before they go down in flames, and instead figure out
a business model that works for everyone. After all, the RIAA
is basically poisoning the very river from which it drinks:
pissing off your customers is the best way to drive your business
into the ground!
One thing for sure: Until the RIAA stops pissing off me and
others like me there is no way I will give them my money: that's
the way I vote. End of story.
|
April 17, 2001
 |
|
Producing High Quality PDF
from LaTeX
Ever wanted to create high-quality PDF documents from your
LaTeX sources? Wish you could have the document provide real
links back to your support website or the latest version of
the document; maybe allow jumping between sets of related documents;
show a good ``bookmark'' outline and control whether it's visible
and/or pre-expanded when the reader loads the document? And
what about these flat grey thumbnail images? Would you not rather
have some high-quality antialiased images of your document's
pages to help the reader find particular pages more easily?
Well, you can do all that and more! All you need is Linux
and a few other packages that good people have made available
for free (such as our own how-to on this subject :-)...
Read our detailed HOW-TO
document now! |
March 22, 2001
 |
|
Good-bye Mir!
The
end of an era. As I write this Mir has already begun its fatal
dive, dropped more than 40 kilometers from its orbit earlier
in the day. In less than an hour, the
Progress cargo ship will push Mir down into the atmosphere
for the final dive.
Lonely it must be aboard; The silence slowly being invaded
by a distant noise, and the serenity of the lonely craft disturbed
by the increasing assault of the atmosphere. And as Mir takes
its final plunge, the fires will erupt and smoke will fill the
ship as it heats up, melts, and is torn apart in minutes. The
storm will skin the craft and burn it up until it is reduced
to metalic steam and many tons of fragments that rain down into
the South Pacific Ocean.
Welcome home, Mir. And good-bye!
/me puts on PF's WYWH...
|
January 1, 2001
 |
|
Happy 3rd Millennium!!
Udo Schuermann and Ringlord Technologies wish you a best
of the new year, the new decade, the new century, and the new
milliennium! That's right: if you thought the year 2000 rang
in the new millennium then you just got the chance to correct
your mistake: the new milllennium begins with the year 2001...
a date oddyssey! [sic] |
 |
|
Understatement of the Millennium?
CNN marks the millenium as "just another new year!" :-) I
think we should nominate that one for the "understatement of
the millennium" (at least until someone asserts that Bush is
a moron)...
January 1, 2001 -- Updated 12:11
a.m. EST, 0511 GMT
New York's crystal ball marks another 'Happy New
Year!'
Spurred on by more than 500,000 roaring partiers, boxing
legend Muhammad Ali pushed a button at midnight Sunday
and sent a Waterford crystal ball floating down in New
York's Times Square, officially marking the arrival
of the New Year. |
|
December 18, 2000
 |
|
Opinions of the Presidential
sElection 2000
Opinions of the Presidential sElection 2000 are beginning
to get a bit old and in the light of recent terrorist attacks
are less than appropriate. For this reason we've taken them
off-line, most likely indefinitely …
(16-Sep-2001) |
June 7, 2000
 |
|
Final Judgement: Microsoft
to be Split in Two
Judge Penfield Jackson issued his final judgement today that
Microsoft is to be split into two companies. Microsoft is expected
to appeal this but it's starting to look pretty grim for them...
|
April 3, 2000
 |
|
Judge Rules: Microsoft a
Monopoly...
Judge Penfield Jackson ruled today that Microsoft is indeed
a monopoly and, through unfair business practices, has harmed
competition in the market place.
It took about ten years for Microsoft
to bury itself a hole deep enough that all their lawyers and
all their public relations wizards couldn't get them out of
this one anymore.
|
April 2, 2000
 |
|
Manipulating the viewer:
DVD Secret Messages
The ability to display secret messages, such as ``Don't
drink and drive'' and ``Respect your parents'' and
``No firearms at school'' appear embedded in the DVD
software that is part of every DVD player. Clearly this is a
blatant attempt to deliver subliminal messages for purposes
of manipulating viewers, and a major legitimizing factor for
the DeCSS software, which has helped reveal this travesty!
How
are
you being manipulated today? Read more! |
January 27, 2000
 |
|
Planned Service Outage
Maintenance on the power-grid will cause our web server to
be down for the weekend. www.ringlord.com will go down late
Friday, January 28, and return to service by Monday, January
31. Please don't panic. :-) |
January 6, 2000
 |
|
Network glitches
A freaked-out network card has created major network problems
for our site in the last three weeks. Several other changes
in the topology have blindsided us to the fact that it was the
stupid network card. Things should be better now and we can
finally update the site again. <sigh> |
 |
|
Amiga Is Coming Home!
After Commodore fucked it up, Escom fumbled it, and Gateway
kept grabbing it but instead kicking it just out of reach, Amino
Development Corp. has got the Amiga's name, domain addresses,
operating system, and access to all significant patents to bring
the old girl out of her ill-deserved exile at last. This may
be the best piece of news since the end of the beginning with
Commodore.
Read Bill
McEwen's Executive Update now! |
October 21, 1999
 |
|
Open Source AmigaOS
Solving the dilemma of continuing support for the aging "Classic"
Amiga, the proposal to Open Source AmigaOS has great merit.
The direction that Gateway/Amiga has taken recently certainly
seems to be paying little or no attention to the "Classic" platform,
nor does the original AmigaOS seem to be playing any role in
those plans. That having been said, we support the idea!!
Read
the proposal yourself |
October 19, 1999
 |
|
Free speech? Hahahaha!
``You have the right to free speech, so long as you're
not dumb enough to actually try it!'' sang The Clash in
a song titled "Know Your Rights (all three of them)". The first
amendment to the United States constitution has been so frequently
attacked, restricted, undermined, or curtailed that the American
political system has effectively made a mockery of it. Sadly
the attacks are becoming more frequent, more strange, and perhaps
more effective. Where will it end?
You decide! |
October 15, 1999
 |
|
Microsoft Tries to Backstab
Justice
As reported by the Washington Post today, Microsoft Corporation
is now trying to get Congress to cut the budget of the Justice
Department by 9 million dollars. Does anyone else smell a repeat
of the business tactics that landed them in court in the first
place? Will Microsoft ever learn?!
Read
the Washington Post article for more details |
September 14, 1999
 |
|
Amiga Commits Suicide
Gateway reams Amiga a new a··hole, and Amiga turns around
and passes on the joyous feeling. Amiga is now concentrating
on "enabling internet services" on other host operating systems.
Whoa, big fucken hairy deal!! My Amiga did that waaay
before Gateway got out of the cow pastures. My Linux box doesn't
need "Amiga internet services" either. Macs can do without that,
and yes, even Windoze, for crying out loud.
If you want to read the insult yourself,
the cool
AmiWeb has a copy of it |
September 10, 1999
 |
|
Amiga Gone For Good?
Only a month ago the brilliant revival of the Amiga computer
was just around the corner. All of a sudden a shadow has moved
across the sun, and it seems to be growing like it has done
for the Amiga so often in the past: Bill McEwen gone and Jim
Collas gone, too, has left us all wondering what we've been
waiting for all this time. And suddenly things go silent: all
the meaty stuff on amiga.com vanishes in a flash. Then the American
staff information goes up in smoke. Next are the message boards.
What next? I suppose that Gateway has sacked the ones with the
vision, singing ``Don't rock my boat...'' Good thing there still
is QNX and Phase5 and quite possibly IWin to carry the torch...
Read AmiWeb for the
latest news of yet another collapse |
July 23, 1999
 |
|
Benchmarketing Revealed:
Herring vs. Windows NT
Benchmarketing appears, on the surface, to be a revelation
of the superiority of one product's features over another, quite
similar to the recent benchmark comparison of Linux vs. NT where
NT apparently beat Linux by a rather astounding margin. This
article reveals the techniques behind such product comparisons
and teaches you what to look for when such benchmarketing attempts
are made.
Educate yourself
about Benchmarketing now! |
July 16, 1999
 |
|
AMIGA Technology Brief
Amiga Inc. have released the Technolgy Brief that
describes their aims at the next generation Amiga. Although
somewhat longer on concept than on technology they are providing
a number of significant details that include Linux and Java.
Makes us happy!!
Read
the introduction and technology brief |
July 10, 1999
 |
|
Next Amiga to use Linux Kernel
In what is perhaps the most shocking news to the Amiga community
in a long time, Amiga president Jim Collas announced yesterday
that the next generation Amiga would not, as previously announced,
be using QNX as its kernel, but will instead be based on the
Linux operating system. Mr. Collas further emphasised that the
revolutionary new technology would have a heavy emphasis on
Java. Needless to say, the combination of all three technologies
that form the focus of RingLord Technologies has made for an
exciting day here...
Quick, read the latest
Amiga news at CUCUG |
 |
|
Bill Gates wets his pants
Unconfirmed reports have it that Bill Gates soiled his trousers
when he found out that Cult of the Dead Cow (CDC) is
today releasing Back Orifice
2000. Microsoft's previously smug assurances to its users
that the original Back Orifice would pose no threat to users
of Windows NT have now come back to haunt the world's most successful
software vendor: Back Orifice 2000 runs on Windows NT!
Find out more from the
Back Orifice 2000 site! |
June 12, 1999
 |
|
IBM alphaWorks releases JDK
for Linux
A port of Sun's JDK 1.1.6 to the Linux Operating System on
Intel architecture (i386), this includes IBM's JIT (Just-in-Time)
compiler technology similar to that found in IBM's JDKs for
OS/2 and MS-Windows. (Update: IBM's JDK is now up to v1.1.8)
Read more
on IBM's alphaWorks site. |
March 17, 1999
 |
|
Our Cool Anagram Creator
now available by T1
``Orange Art Manager'' is an anagram of what? That's right:
``Anagram Generator''! This nifty CGI software is driven through
our cool (web) document assembly tool:
WebLord to produce fully integrated
dynamic pages. On a T1 you'll get much better response now.
|
March 15, 1999
 |
|
WebLord and Daytona!
RingLord Technologies announces the long-awaited
GUI for WebLord, the Document Assembly Tool! Update:
Daytona was canceled, the GUI for WebLord is not likely to happen.
|
January 5, 1999
 |
|
Windows 2000 Delayed
Microsoft announced today that the release date for its new
operating system, Windows 2000, has been delayed until the 2nd
quarter of 1901.
|
December 16, 1998
 |
|
Java Native Interface (JNI)
How-To
We have just completed a small tutorial / how-to on
the Java Native Interface (JNI). The example calls on a native
library to construct a Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID)
which Java can then use to uniquely identify objects on the
net.
Check out
the JNI How-to |
December 8, 1998
 |
|
JDK 1.2 Becomes Java 2!
Today, on the official release day of the latest issue of
Sun Microsystem's Java Platform, Sun has announced that the
new release is now officially called Java 2.
See the JavaSoft
pages for all the details |
December 5, 1998
|